Dominican University

Graduate School of Library and Information Science

LIS 701: Introduction to Library and Information Science

Summer II, 2007

Monday and Wednesday, 5:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m.

 

Instructor:                  Sheryl Nichin-Keith

Office Hours:             One-half hour before class and by appointment

Telephone:                 773-283-4169

E-mail:                        snichin@aol.com

 

 

Course Description

(from GSLIS Catalog)

 

An overview of the history, philosophy, purpose, functions and processes, users, collections and evaluation of academic, public, school and special libraries and information centers; of the history and trends of books and other media, publishing and information technology; of the principles and basic elements of the collection development process; of relevant legal and ethical topics – intellectual property (copyright), access, confidentiality of records, intellectual freedom and censorship; and of current professional issues.

 

Course Objectives

 

Since this course is an introductory course, the assessment of objectives will be at a basic level.  At the conclusion of this course, students will be able to

  • demonstrate an understanding of information infrastructure and information policy
  • demonstrate an understanding of where libraries fit in the developing information infrastructure
  • demonstrate an understanding of the similarities and differences in the purposes, functions and processes, users, collections, and evaluation of academic, public, school, special libraries and information centers
  • describe the history and trends of libraries and information centers, books and other media, publishing, and information technology
  • describe and discuss important economic and policy issues related to the creation and dissemination of information
  • demonstrate a knowledge of the principles and basic elements of the collection development process and an understanding of how the growth of information in electronic formats are changing the way librarians develop collections for users
  • demonstrate an understanding of intellectual property, access, confidentiality of records, intellectual freedom, and censorship, along with other relevant current legal and ethical topics
  •  discuss major professional current issues
  • articulate an initial philosophy of library/information science

Required Texts

 

Gorman, Michael.  Our Enduring Values: Librarianship in the 21st Century.

American Library Association, 2000.

 

Richard E. Rubin.  Foundations of Library and Information Science. 2nd ed.

New York: Neal-Schuman, 2004. 

 

In addition, each student will read one other non-fiction book from a list to be distributed in class.

 

Additional Assigned Readings

 

Other assigned readings will include journal articles and Internet resources.  These readings are listed under the appropriate date in the Schedule portion of the syllabus.  All of the journal articles are available as full-text articles in databases accessible through the Rebecca Crown Library web site at: http://domweb.dom.edu/library/crown/.

 

 

RESOURCES

 

Blackboard Accounts:

            An online Blackboard (http://Blackboard.dom.edu) has been set up to facilitate the sharing of information, either administrative or questions about the class content.  This is a private Blackboard accessible only to students currently enrolled in the course.  I will provide  instruction on setting up your Blackboard account during the first class session.  I will also set up Discussion Groups so we can share questions and ideas by e-mail.  Please feel free to post Blackboard messages to communicate and share ideas with each other.  Also feel free to contact me directly if you feel your questions or comments are not appropriate for Blackboard.  It will be your responsibility to check Blackboard routinely for any announcements, clarification of assignments, and general discussions, and to participate in them.  Participation on Blackboard will count towards your mark in class participation.

 

Library and Information Science Journals and Electronic Resources

 

You should develop the habit of reading library and information science journals

such as American Libraries, Library Journal, Library Trends, Library Quarterly, Libri,

Illinois Libraries, Wired, etc., along with the more specialized journals of your interest.  It is well worthwhile to spend time browsing in the periodical section of Rebecca Crown Library.  Several area academic libraries (e.g., DePaul University, Northwestern University, Oakland Community College, Governors State University) also have holdings of many of these journal titles.

 

There are also many free electronic discussion groups and blogs that deal with aspects of library and information science.  Web sites of library and information science organizations will often list their discussion groups and indicate how one "subscribes” to it.  Be sure to save instructions on how to “unsubscribe” to an electronic discussion group.  We will discuss some of these resources on July 11.

 

Resource Guides and Review Sources

(Useful for Subject Bibliography Assignment)

 

Crown Library Web Site – Citation Guides:  http://domweb.dom.edu/library/Crown/citationguides.htm

 

Crown Library Web Site – GSLIS Resources:  http://libsnap.dom.edu/ClassPages/lis7012006.htm

 

GSLIS Web Site – Career Paths:  http://domin.dom.edu/depts/GSLIS/InfoCntr/PATHWAYS/PATHWAYSMAIN.htm

 

GSLIS Web Site – Course Guide:  http://domin.dom.edu/depts/GSLIS/GSLISCourseGuide.pdf

 

Dominican University Intranet – GSLIS Syllabi:

http://domin.dom.edu/gslissyll.htm

 


ASSIGNMENTS AND OTHER CLASS REQUIREMENTS

 

Assignments are due as follows:

 

July 11                        Proposed GSLIS sequence of courses

July 16                        History of Libraries reports

July 18                        Blog assignment

                                    Association presentations begin on July 18

and continue through August 15

July 23                        “L” Word issue paper          

July 25                        Subject Bibliography

Role of Academic Libraries issue paper

July 30                        Ads in Schools issue paper

August 1                     Outsourcing issue paper

August 6                     Quality vs Demand issue paper

August 8                     Copyright issue paper

August 13                   Patriot Act issue paper

August 15                   Certification issue paper

August 17                   Research Analysis Paper

August 22                   Final Exam

                                   


  1. Class Participation  10%

Attend every class and participate in discussions.  Read the assigned material and come to class prepared to discuss and critique these readings.  You are always encouraged to bring additional literature to the attention of the class.  Absences, late arrivals, and early departures will affect your class participation grade.

 

  1. Issue Papers  15%

Throughout the semester, the class discussions will cover numerous professional issues and debates.  You will need to complete three (out of a possible eight) issue papers during the semester that are based on some of these discussions.  A handout that identifies the key questions surrounding a particular issue or debate will be given at the end of the class session when an issues-based topic is discussed.  Each issue paper should be a two- to three-page, typed paper that sharply focuses on the topic. In these papers state your own well thought-out, critical opinions– not those of others.  Each issue paper is due at the class session that immediately follows the issue-based discussion.

 

  1. Blog Assignment  10%

Monitor one library blog selected from a list to be distributed in class.  Check the postings for the last week and review the responses to the postings.  Summarize the main issues in those postings and post your summary to our Blackboard discussion board.  Respond/comment on at least one of the summaries posted by another student.  Refer to the assignment guidelines distributed in class for additional information and the evaluation criteria.  This assignment is due on July 18.

 

  1. Association Presentations  10% 

Deliver a brief presentation that introduces the class members to an association that is of interest to librarians/information professionals.  The presentation should be 5-7 minutes in length.  Refer to the assignment guidelines distributed in class for additional information and the evaluation criteria.  Presentations will be scheduled on July 18, July 23, July 25, July 30, August 1, August 6, August 8, August 13, and August 15.

 

  1. Library history paper: 10%

Select a library history topic from a list provided to the class, prepare a short paper (2-3 pages, double-spaced) about the topic and contribute to the class discussion on the history of libraries.  Students will also be asked to post comments to Blackboard.  Refer to the assignment guidelines distributed in class for additional information and the evaluation criteria.  This assignment is due on July 16.

 

  1. Subject Bibliography  15%

For this assignment, you will need to use review sources to develop a subject bibliography of twelve to fifteen sources.  In brief, you will be selecting a type of library, identifying your audience, choosing a subject, and preparing an annotated bibliography of recent materials recommended for addition to a library or information center collection.  Refer to the assignment guidelines distributed in class for additional information and the evaluation criteria. The assignment is due on July 25.

 

  1. Research and Analysis Paper  15%

Prepare a future scenario for a specific type of library, media center, information agency, or library/information service that interests you (and meets with the approval of the instructor).  Your paper (6-8 pages, double-spaced) should be based on a literature review of the trends and issues influencing the future direction of the type of library/center/agency or service you choose and should describe the likely scenario that will unfold over the next five years.  Refer to the assignment guidelines distributed in class for additional information and the evaluation criteria.  Your paper is due on August 20.

 

  1. Complete an exam on August 22.  15%

 

Grading

 

Grades will be determined as follows:                                               

 

            Class participation                               10%

Four issue papers:                                 15%

            Blog Assignment                                   10%

Library History Assignment                   10%

            Subject Bibliography:                15%

            Research and Analysis Assignment        15%

            Final exam:                                           15%

            Total                                                   100%

 

 


 

 

LIS GRADING POLICY (Effective 12/15/2004)

 

The faculty of the Graduate School of Library and Information Science use the following guidelines in their grading.

 

Grade

Point span

Numeric

Equivalent

 

Definition

 

A

100-95

4.0

Outstanding achievement.  Student performance demonstrates full command of the course materials and evinces a high level of originality and/or creativity that far surpasses course expectations; nearly flawless work.

 

A-

94-90

3.67

Excellent achievement.  Student performance demonstrates thorough knowledge of the course materials and exceeds course expectations by completing all requirements in a superior manner.

 

B+

89-85

3.33

Good solid work.  Student demonstrates strong comprehension of the course materials and exceeds course expectations on all tasks as defined in the course syllabus.

 

B

84-80

3.0

Satisfactory acceptable work.  Student performance meets designated course expectations, demonstrates understanding of the course materials and performs at an acceptable level.

 

B-

79-75

2.67

Marginal work.  Student performance demonstrates incomplete, substandard understanding of course materials, or absence of required work; indicates danger of falling below acceptable grading standard.

 

C+

74-70

2.33

Unsatisfactory work.  Student performance demonstrates  unsatisfactory understanding of course materials and inability to meet course requirements.

 

C

69-65

2.0

Unacceptable work.  Student performance demonstrates incomplete and inadequate understanding of course materials.

 

C-

64

1.67

Poor work.

 

F

59 and below

0.0

Failing grade.

 

 


Note regarding late assignments:  Assignments are due at the beginning of the class session on the date indicated. Issue papers will only be accepted on the date due i.e. cannot be turned in after the due date.  For other papers, one point of the total points that a paper can earn will be deducted for each day the paper is late.  For example, the Library History report is due July 16 and is worth a total of 10 points.  If a student submits that paper on July 18, the maximum number of points that the student can earn will be 8 points.  If a student has a crisis, s/he must bring this to my attention immediately if s/he expects any adjustment to the assignment schedule.  I will then decide on a case-by-case basis if late penalties will be reduced or waived.

 

Academic Honesty and Integrity:  “All students of the GSLIS are expected to observe high standards of academic honesty and integrity.  Appropriate credit must be given to the original creators of all work used.  Any student whose conduct violates such standards may be subject to disciplinary action as determined by due process.”  (GSLIS Bulletin, p. 48)  Please see the Dominican University Student Handbook for the full statement on academic integrity..

 

Format of Assignments:

 

All assignments will be double-spaced and will use a 12 font size.  All papers should be double spaced and include page numbers.  All assignments will be expected to have a coversheet.  An example of this coversheet can be found in the “Assignments” section of Blackboard.  I expect you will modify it appropriately for each assignment.

  

Any essay (be it for assignments or for exams) will be evaluated on the following criteria: 

 

            Persuasive presentation of position

                        Supporting reasons are sufficient and appropriate

                        Position is effectively supported

                        Evidence of reading and reflection

            Clarity of exposition

                        Logical train of thought

                        Adequate connections between ideas, examples, etc.

            Quality of writing

                        Proper grammar, spelling and sentence structure

            Inclusion of a bibliography as appropriate

Use of correct citation style such as Turabian/University of Chicago, MLA, or APA..

 

Classroom policies regarding attendance and late arrival:

 

            Students are expected to arrive to class on time and stay for the entire session.  Students who must miss a class due to religious observance, illness or other emergency should notify me by e-mail or phone before class time.  Students are responsible for obtaining class materials distributed during their absence, for ensuring their familiarity with the material covered in class, and for completing any assignments on schedule. 


SCHEDULE

 

July 9              Overview of the Course and Introductions

Class activities:  Discussion of Syllabus and class expectations

Using Dominican University Databases—Molly Beestrum, Systems Librarian, Crown Library, Dominican University

 

July 11            The Information Infrastructure:  Libraries in Context

Read:  Rubin, Ch. 1-2

Class activities:  Introduction to Blackboard and library blogs

Discussion of readings

                        Assignment Due: Obtain a Dominican email account

                                    Prepare a proposed GSLIS sequence of courses for your degree.

Include a brief paragraph that describes your career goals at this point
 

 

July 16            The Library as an Institution

                        Read:  Rubin, Ch. 7                                         

                        Gorman, Introduction, Ch.1-2

 Casey, Michael and Laura Savasthinuk.  “Library 2.0,” Library Journal 131 (September 1, 2006): 40-42.

 

                        Class activities:   Discussion of readings and history of libraries papers

                        Assignment Due: Reports on history of libraries

 

 

July 18            Trends in Information Technology and the Publishing Industry                             Read:  Rubin, Ch. 3

                                    Gorman, Ch. 3-5         

“Overview of Collection Development” section of the Arizona State

Library’s collection development tutorial. (Available online at: http://www.lib.az.us/cdt/)

Carlson, Scott.  “Do Libraries Really Need Books.” Chronicle of Higher

             Education 48 (July 12, 2002): A31+.

Epstein, Jason.  “The Future of Books.” Technology Review 108

(January, 2005): 60-62.

Keller, Michael, Victoria Reich, and Andrew Herkovic. 

“What is a Library Anymore, Anyway?”  First Monday 8 (May 2003).  (Available online at: http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue8_5/keller/index.html.) (accessed 7/6/07)

                       

                        Class activities:  Discussion of readings

                             Blog Assignments due

     Association Presentations begin

July 23            Academic Libraries

                        Read:  Rubin, Ch.  9 (pp. 402-415)

Marcum, Deanna.  One Size Will Not Fit All.” Chronicle of Higher Education 52 (December 9, 2005): B24+.

 

Neal, James.  “Information Anarchy or Information Utopia?Chronicle of Higher Education.  52 (December 9, 2005): B23-24.

 

“Q&A: Academic Libraries.” Chronicle of Higher Education 52 (December 9, 2005): B24+.

Class activities:   Guest speaker:  Sally Anderson, Director of North Park University Brandel Library

                          Discussion of readings

                          Association Presentations continue

Assignment Due:  “L” Word issue paper

                                                     

July 25            School Library Media Centers

            Read:  Rubin, Ch. 9 (pp. 392-402)

            Overview material available on the American Association of School Librarians web site it:  http://www.ala.org/ala/aasl:  (accessed 7/6/07

 

Learning About the Job (http://www.ala.org/ala/aasl/aasleducation/recruitmentlib/learningabout/learningabout.htm)  (accessed 7/6/07

 

Roles and Responsibilities of the School Library Media Specialist  (http://www.ala.org/aaslTemplate.cfm?Section=informationpower&Template=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=19930) (accessed 7/6/07)

Presentations from the White House Conference on School Libraries (2002):

(Best read in the order listed.)

 

Lance, Keith Curry.  “What Research Tells Us About the Importance of School Libraries.”  White House Conference on School Libraries.  (Available online at:  http://www.imls.gov/news/events/whitehouse_2.shtm)  (accessed 7/6/07)

 

Hartzell, Gary.  “What’s It Take?” White House Conference on School Libraries.  (Available online at:  http://www.imls.gov/news/events/whitehouse_2.shtm#gh)  (accessed 7/6/07)

 

                        Class activities:  Guest speaker: Paul Whitsitt, Director, Department of

                                    Libraries and Information Services, Chicago Public Schools

Association Presentations continue

Discussion of readings

Assignment Due:  The Role of Academic Libraries Issue Paper

                                Subject Bibliography Due

 

 

July 30            Special Libraries and Information Centers

                        Read:              Rubin, Ch. 9 (pp.  415 - 421)

Abram, Stephen.  “The 10 R’s Facing Information Professionals in Our

 Association.”  Information Outlook 7 (August 2003): 28+.

Ard, Constance.  “What Are ‘Special Libraries’ and What Do ‘Special

            Librarians

Do?”  Kentucky Libraries 64 (Spring 2000): 16-18.Special Library

            Association.  Special Librarians: Putting Knowledge to

            Work.(Available online at:       http://www.sla.org/content/SLA/professional/meaning/what/index.cfm  (accessed 7/6/07)

Class activities:  Guest speaker:  Susan P.  Siebers, Director of Library &

 Information Services, Katten Muchin Zavis Rosenman

            Association Presentations continue

Discussion of readings

                        Assignment Due:  Ads in Schools Issue Paper

 
August 1         Public Libraries:  History and Development

                        Read:   Rubin, Ch. 9 (pp. 373 - 392)

Auld, Hampton.  “The Future of Public Libraries … Today!”  Public

 Libraries 42 (March/April 2003): 78-8

St. Lifer, Evan and Norman Oder.  “What Public Libraries Must Do To

 Survive.” Library Journal 126 (April 1, 2001): 60+.

                        Sullivan, Michael.  “The Fragile Future of Public Libraries.”  Public

                                    Libraries 42 (September/October 2003): 303-308.)

Class activities:  Visit to the Newberry Library

     Association Presentations continue

     Discussion of readings

                        Assignment Due:  Outsourcing Issue Paper

         

August 6         Information Policy:  Stakeholders and Agendas--Copyright Issues

                        Read:  Rubin, Ch. 4

                        Gorman, Ch. 11

                        

American Library Association copyright web page:  http://www.ala.org/ala/washoff/WOissues/copyrightb/copyright.htm (Accessed 7/6/07)

 

                       A series of articles in Technology Review (June 2005):

                           (Best to read in the order listed.)

 

“Who Should Own Ideas? The Courts and Legislatures Should Preserve Copyright -- But Carefully.Technology Review (June 2005).  (Available online at:  http://www.technologyreview.com/read_article.aspx?id=14529&ch=infotech)  9accessed 7/6/07)

 

Lessig, Lawrence.  “The People Own Ideas! Do We Want Music, Software, and Books to be Free -- Or Not?”  Technology Review (June 2005).  (Available online at:  http://www.technologyreview.com/read_article.aspx?id=14505&ch=infotech)  (accessed 7/6/07)

 

Epstein, Richard.  “The Creators Own Ideas: Contrary to What Lawrence Lessig Says, a Truly Free Society Allows for Proprietary Systems.” Technology Review (June 2005).  (Available online at:  http://www.technologyreview.com/read_article.aspx?id=16353)  (accessed 7/6/07)

 

Vaidhyanathan, Siva.  “Copyright as Cudgel.”  Chronicle of Higher

            Education (August 2, 2002): B7.

Class activities:  Association Presentations continue

    Discussion of readings

Assignment Due: Quality versus Demand issue paper

 

August 8         Information Policy:  Intellectual Freedom Issues and U.S. Patriot Act

                        Read:  Rubin, Ch. 5

                           Gorman, Ch. 6

                              Airoldi, Joan.  “Case Study: A Grand Jury Subpoena in the PATRIOT

                              Act Era,” Library Administration & Management 20 (Winter 2006): 26-29.

 

                        Class activities:  Association Presentations continue

     Discussion of readings

                        Assignment Due:  Copyright issue paper       

 

August 13       Information Policy:  Privacy and Equity of Access Issues

                        Read:              Gorman, Ch. 9 & 10

                        Class activities:  Association Presentations continue

    Discussion of readings

                        Assignment Due:  Patriot Act issue paper

                                   

August 15       Ethics and the LIS Profession

                        Read:  Rubin, Ch. 8

American Library Association “ALA Code of Ethics.”  Available at

http://www.ala.org/ala/oif/statementspols/codeofethics/codeethics.htm (accessed 7/6/07).

                        Class activities:  Association Presentations continue

    Discussion of readings          

                        Assignment Due:  Certification issue paper                                          

 

August 20       Librarianship: An Evolving Profession                    

Read:  Rubin, Ch. 10

                                    Gorman, Ch. 12

                        Martin, Robert S.  “Libraries and Librarians in the 21st Century:  Fostering

                                    a Learning Society.”  College & Research Libraries News.

                                    (December, 2004):  668-671.

Roush, Wade.  “The Infinite Library.”  Technology Review, (May, 2005):

 54-59.

Class activities:  Future Directions & Discussion of Selected “Context”

            Books

                        Assignment Due:  Research/Analysis Paper Due

                                         

 

August 22       Final Exam

 

 


 

LIS701:  INTRODUCTION TO LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE

 

 

ISSUE PAPER:  THE “L” WORD

 

Due:  July 23

 

Questions to consider:         How essential is the word “library” to the profession today?

                                          Is the word “library” outdated and passé?

Is the use of the term “library” only suitable for certain types of

      libraries?

Are there other words that could be or should be used to describe what we do and where we work?

What are the advantages or disadvantages to using the word “library”?

                                         

Prepare a two- to three-page paper that sharply focuses on the topic and presents your well thought-out, critical opinions.  Be sure to support your points with specifics (i.e., examples, references to the course readings, comparisons, analogies, statistics, etc.)  You may use the questions above to help develop your position related to the central topic.

 

Your paper will be evaluated using the following criteria:

 

·        Persuasive presentation of position

-         supporting reasons are sufficient, cogent, and appropriate

-         position is effectively supported

 

·        Clarity of exposition

-         logical train of thought

-         adequate connections between ideas, generalizations, and examples

 

·        Use of writing conventions

-         proper grammar, spelling, and sentence structure

 


LIS701:  INTRODUCTION TO LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE

 

 

Issue Paper:

 

The Future of the Book in the Library/Information Center

 

Due:  July 20

 

 

 

Background:                       Views about the future of the book range from predictions in the 1980’s of a “paperless society” to Crawford’s “paper persists” in the article you read for class.

 

Questions to consider:         What do you think will be the role of publications in paper format in the library of 2025?

 

                                          Will books be relegated to “museums of the book” as some refer to future libraries?

 

                                          Are there parallels between the development of the printing press and electronic publishing that should encourage or discourage those who support a primarily paperless society?

 

                                          Are there unintended effects of the digitization of information that we can foresee and guard against?

 

 

Prepare a two- to three-page paper that sharply focuses on the topic and presents your well thought-out, critical opinions.  Be sure to support your points with specifics (i.e., examples, references to the course readings, comparisons, analogies, statistics, etc.)  You may use the questions above to help develop your position related to the central topic but you are not limited to these questions.

 

 

Your paper will be evaluated using the following criteria:

 

·        Persuasive presentation of position

-         supporting reasons are sufficient, cogent, and appropriate

-         position is effectively supported

 

·        Clarity of exposition

-         logical train of thought

-         adequate connections between ideas, generalizations, and examples

 

·        Use of writing conventions

-         proper grammar, spelling, and sentence structure


LIS701:  INTRODUCTION TO LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE

 

Issue Paper:  Quality vs  Demand

 

Due:  August 6

 

 

Questions to Consider:              What do you consider to be the primary role(s) of a public library?  Why?

 

Should every public library have the same mission?  What factors need to be considered in determining a public library’s mission?

 

                                                What should be the library’s responsibility for acquiring mass-market popular materials? 

 

Are high circulation statistics an adequate standard for measuring a public library’s “success”?  Why or why not?   

 

 

Your paper will be evaluated using the following criteria:

 

·        Persuasive presentation of position

-         supporting reasons are sufficient, cogent, and appropriate

-         position is effectively supported

 

·        Clarity of exposition

-         logical train of thought

-         adequate connections between ideas, generalizations, and examples

·        Use of writing conventions

·        proper grammar, spelling, and sentence structure


LIS701:  INTRODUCTION TO LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE

 

Issue Paper

 

Ads in Schools:  Corporate Control or Corporate Support

 

Due:    July 30

 

Background:     An Internet service provider recently initiated a program to equip interested schools with a lab of fifteen Internet-connected PCs and a satellite dish, free of charge.  In exchange, the Internet service provider targeted advertisements to the students via the computers and gathered information about the number of students visiting the ads, the gender of the students, and the school’s zip code.  This information was then sold to the advertisers.  Over 1500 schools participated in the program.

 

 

Questions to consider:               Is this type of corporate involvement in schools appropriate or is it an exploitation of students?

 

Do schools/libraries have a responsibility to inform families about this type of arrangement if they participate? 

 

Could librarians take advantage of such arrangements by teaching students how to evaluate material on the Internet?

 

What other factors should be considered when accepting                                                           corporate support?

 

 

Prepare a two- to three-page paper that sharply focuses on the topic and presents your well thought-out, critical opinions.  Be sure to support your points with specifics (i.e., examples, references to the course readings, comparisons, analogies, statistics, etc.)  You may use the questions above to help develop your position related to the central topic but you are not limited to them.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Your paper will be evaluated using the following criteria:

 

·        Persuasive presentation of position

-         supporting reasons are sufficient, cogent, and appropriate

-         position is effectively supported

 

·        Clarity of exposition

-         logical train of thought

-         adequate connections between ideas, generalizations, and examples

·        Use of writing conventions

·        proper grammar, spelling, and sentence structure


 

LIS701:  INTRODUCTION TO LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE

 

ISSUE PAPER:  OUTSOURCING

 

Due:  August 1

 

Background:     Some library and information service functions that have traditionally been handled internally by library staff are now being “outsourced” to other types of organizations or vendors.  Within the profession, there is a growing debate about the extent to which library activities should be outsourced.

 

Questions to consider:         Are there library functions that should never be outsourced?  If so, which functions and why?

 

                                          Does outsourcing some library services constitute the privatization of a public institution?

 

                                          What advantages might be gained from outsourcing some library activities?  What are the disadvantages of outsourcing?

 

                                          Does outsourcing provide an opportunity for enhanced library services and improved library management?

 

                                          Are commercial enterprises, with their profit-making goals, ultimately at odds with the service-based goals of librarianship?

 

                                          Will the percentage o