Spring

Philosophy of law

MWF 11:30-12:20

2000

POSC325

LS024

 

Mr. Colmo

 

 

farabi@dom.edu

 

 

January

 

Feb.

 

14

A Day Without Laws

23

Privacy

17

 Rule of Law

25

(IBHE)

19

Sources of Law

28

Economic Approach to Law

21

 

March

 

24

Natural Law

1

Scope of Law (Dworkin)

26

 Common Law

3

Dworkin, cont.

28

(IBHE)

6

Mid-

31

What is Law? (Posner)

8

Semester

February

 

10

Break

2

Universality (Plato)

13

Scope of Law (Aristotle)

4

essay exam

15

essay exam

7

Stare Decisis/Discretion

17

Montesquieu, Spirit of Law

9

Critical Legal Studies

20

 

11

Crimes Against Humanity

22

 

14

Law as Principle (Dworkin)

24

(IBHE)

16

Dworkin, cont.

27

 

18

essay exam

29

 

21

Substantive Due Process

31

 

 

April

 

April

 

3

19

5

 

21

no class--Easter

7

 

24

 

10

 

26

 

12

 

28

no class (IBHE)

14

 

May

 

17

 

1-4

Final Exam (there will be one)

 

In addition to four exams, please bring to class each day some question, problem, or objection from or to the readings and be prepared to offer this as a topic for discussion.

Attendance and active participation are not optional. Silence will adversely affect one's final grade.

Variable credit: you will need to arrange a research paper. 

 

Course Objective: To understand, not this or that legal system, but rather the fundamental problem of the law and, therewith, both the necessity and limits of the law. (1) The fundamental problem of the law is time. The temporality of human things means that circumstances change. At least one purpose of the law is to create stability and predictability. To this end, the law must be unchanging. An unchanging law must come into conflict with changing circumstances. Law without discretion becomes unjust, but law that is simply discretionary becomes the arbitrary rule of men. (2) Montesquieu tries to solve this problem by narrowing the scope of law, by creating a sphere the law does not touch. Montesquieu creates liberal politics. In so doing, he creates a kind of politics and law that claim to be universal. But universality raises, in a new way, all the problems that belong to unchanging law.