Title: THE ENERGY SPIRAL , By: Huber, Peter, Forbes, 00156914, 4/1/2002, Vol. 169,
Issue 8
Database: Academic Search Elite
THE
ENERGY SPIRAL
The Bush Administration's energy
policy: Drill more domestic oil and aim for a more fuel-efficient economy-i.e.,
get more GDP per gallon. The Democratic leadership's policy: Drill less and
build more fuel-efficient cars-i.e., get more miles per gallon. Neither side
dares to articulate the one all-but-certain fact: Our energy
consumption will continue to rise, forever. "Forever" is a long time,
of course, so maybe it won't be quite that long. But if you have to project
when energy consumption will cease to rise, longer is always a
safer bet than shorter.
And that's because the more energy
we consume, the more we're able to produce. This is the unspeakable truth, so
obvious and yet so unpopular, too, that no politician with an instinct for
survival dares to utter it. Be that as it may, the entire history of life on
Earth establishes that the better you get at extracting energy
from your environment today, the better you get tomorrow-it's a chain-reaction
process, and it spirals up, not down. It is, if you will, a
perpetual motion machine.
No, it won't be found in some crank
inventor's box that's filled with spinning magnets. It's called life. Humans
are especially good at this game, but plankton and kudzu do pretty well at it,
too.
Four billion years ago life on Earth
captured no solar energy at all, because there was no life.
Life then got a foothold, and the capture and consumption of energy
in the biosphere has been rising ever since. The thicker life grew on the
surface of the planet, the more energy life as a whole managed
to capture. It used all that energy to create more life. Along
the way it deposited huge amounts of biological debris underground. Which we
now dig up and burn.
An organism called James Watt
emerged from the biological cauldron two centuries ago with an idea about how
to dig up the debris more efficiently. He would build a better coal-fired steam
engine, which would be used to pump water out of coal mines to facilitate the
mining of still more coal. Today we burn diesel to extract petroleum. When
Enrico Fermi built the first fission reactor, the idea was to use one neutron
emitted by a uranium atom to kick out two neutrons from other uranium atoms
nearby. The atom bomb did the same, only faster.
None of these processes produces
"perpetual motion" in the strict thermodynamic sense, of course. They
all just improve on the process of grabbing energy from somewhere
else. The most important ones merely help us to look for high-grade energy
in the right place. You can use a motor to whomp the ground really hard, for
example, to project acoustic waves down through the Earth, and then carefully
study the reflections to locate new oil and gas. Knowing where to look is most
of the game. The Earth contains gargantuan amounts of both fossil and nuclear
fuels; the problem has always been how to find and extract them efficiently
enough to make the effort worthwhile.
Living green plants still capture
solar energy about three times as fast as we humans are able to
dig up dead green plants in the form of fossil fuels. We'll overtake the rest
of nature in the not too distant future, however. And perhaps some day we'll
get to the point where we, too, can take much of our energy
directly from the sun. There's certainly plenty of solar energy
to spare-green plants currently capture only about one-three-thousandth of the
solar energy that cascades onto the surface of the Earth.
But whether we catch our solar energy
live, or dig it up in fossilized form, or dig up uranium instead, is really
just a detail. The one near-certainty is that energy
consumption will rise, not fall. We have 200 years of industrial history,
20,000 years of human history and 4 billion years of biological history to go
on in making that prediction. In the grand scheme of things everything we think
we know about "running out of energy" is not just
wrong-it's the exact opposite of the truth. The more we capture and burn, the
better we get at capturing still more.