DOMINICAN UNIVERSITY

GRADUATE SCHOOL OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE

 

LIS 703-03 Organization of Knowledge

Spring 2008 – Jan. 10-May 1

Thursdays, 6:00-9:00 pm

Marjorie E. Bloss, Instructor

Crown 342  

E-mail:  mbloss@dom.edu

Office hours:  By appointment

1-708-524-6468

 

COURSE DESCRIPTION:

          Bulletin Description of the Course:  An overview of principles, methods and systems in the organization of all types of library materials and information.  An introduction to the basic level use and interpretation of principles for AACR2R, subject headings, Dewey Decimal Classification, OCLC (Online Computer Library Center), MARC21 formats, and Library of Congress Classification.

 

TEXT BOOKS AND REQUIRED READING:  All textbooks are available for purchase from the bookstore although you are welcome to purchase them elsewhere (e.g., Amazon).  Required readings are listed below.

 

TEXTBOOKS

 

Anglo-American Cataloging Rules, 2nd revised edition, 2002 with the 2005 updates.  Chicago : American Library Association, 2005.  [This is comes either with a loose-leaf binder and tabs, called the “kit” – ISBN 0-8389-3556-7, $99.00], or you can purchase only the pages and buy your own notebook for it (ISBN 0-8389-3555-9, $75.00.  If you are a member of the American Library Association and purchase AACR2R from them you get a 10% discount.]

 

Taylor, Arlene G.  The Organization of Information.  2nd edition.  Englewood, Colo. : Libraries Unlimited, 2004.  ISBN 1-56308-976-9 (hard cover); 1-56308-969-6 (pbk.)

 

Taylor, Arlene G.  Introduction to Cataloging and Classification. 10th  ed.   Englewood, Colo.  Libraries Unlimited, 2006.  ISBN 1591582350 (pbk.)  $50.00

 

ADDITIONAL REQUIRED READINGS FOR THE COURSE.   

 

Borges, Jorge Luis.  “The Library of Babel.”  Available online at:   

          http://jubal.westnet.com/hyperdiscordia/library_of_babel.html     (last viewed 4/20/2004)

 

Catalogers Desktop.  Available on the computers at the Rebecca Crown GSLIS Computer Lab only.  At this writing, this cannot be accessed via the Web.

 

Cutter Sanborn Three-Figure Author Table.  Englewood, Colo. : Libraries Unlimited, 1969.  Available in Room 203 and at MLS.

 

 

Dewey Decimal Classification.  Four vol. set available in Room 203.  Online version, see:

          http://www.oclc.org/dewey/versions/ddc22print/

  

Dublin Core Metadata Element Set, Version 1.1: Reference Description”.  Available online at:            http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/

 

Dewey and the Alien. http://www.columbia.k12.mo.us/dre/dewey/Alien/alien.htm

 

Goldberger, Paul.  “The Skyline: High-Tech Bibliophilia (Rem Koolhaas’s Seattle Public Library.)”  New Yorker, v. 80, no. 13, May 24, 2004, pp. 90-92.  (Online through Dominican Library’s website.)

 

Joint Steering Committee for the Revision of AACR2 – RDA FAQ.  http://www.collectionscanada.ca/jsc/index.html

 

Library of Congress Authorities.  Available online at:

          http://www.authorities.loc.gov

 

Library of Congress.  LC Classification Outline.  Washington, D.C. : Cataloging Distribution Service.  Available in Room 203 and at MLS.  Also available online at:

          http://lcweb.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/lcco/lcco.html

 

Library of Congress Classification Tables (latest editions).  Available in Room 203.  Also available online at:

          http://lcweb.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/lcco/lcco.html

 

Library of Congress.  MARC21 format.  Washington, D.C. : Cataloging Distribution Service.  Available online at:

          http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/ecbdhome.html

Also available at http://connexion.oclc.org

(See separate document for authorization numbers and passwords.)

 

Library of Congress.  Understanding MARC Bibliographic.  Washington, D.C. : Cataloging Distribution Service.  Available online at:

          www.loc.gov/marc/umb/

 

Library of Congress Subject Headings.  Available in Room 203.  Also available through Classification Web.

 

It is expected that you will explore and become familiar with the Library of Congress’ online services and catalog (they use the same system as Dominican) as well as their other cataloging and classification services, including tools for cataloging and classification.

          http://www.loc.gov

 

MARC Format, Bibliographic:  http://www.oclc.org/bibformats/en/default.shtm

 

 

OCLC Connexion.  See separate hand-out. 

 

Sears List of Subject Headings.  19th ed.  New York : H.W. Wilson, 2007.  Available in Room 203 and at MLS.

 

Search Engines.  Here is a URL for various search engines you may wish to review.  http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_100_alternative_search_engines.php

 

Tillett, Barbara.  What is FRBR?  Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress, 2004.  (http://www.loc.gov/cds/FRBR.html)

 

Understanding MARC Bibliographic Machine-Readable Cataloging.  Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress, 2003.  (http://lcweb.loc.gov/marc/umb/)

 

OCLC ACCESS:

            http://www.oclc.org/home/

 

The Searching WorldCat Reference Card is available in HTML format at:

          http://www.oclc.rg/support/documentation/worldcat/searching/refcard/

It is also available in PDF format at:

          http://www.oclc.org/support/documentation/worldcat/searching/refcard/searchworldcatquickref.pdf

 

          There is a laboratory on the third floor (next to the office) that is set up with computers giving you access to Catalogers Desktop, OCLC’s WorldCat and Connexion, Dublin Core Metadata standards, Authorities User Guide, Authority Record Format.  You are also able to access the various subject databases subscribed to by Dominican.  It is expected that you will explore and become familiar with the OCLC URLs in particular.  

 

The Instructor assumes the right to modify the assigned readings during the semester as is appropriate.

 

BLACKBOARD ACCOUNTS:

 

          An online Blackboard (http://Blackboard.dom.edu) has been set up to facilitate the sharing of information, either administrative or questions about the class content.  This is a private Blackboard accessible only to students currently enrolled in the course.  I will provide instruction on setting up your Blackboard account during the first class session.  I will also set up Discussion Groups so we can share questions and ideas by e-mail.  Please feel free to post Blackboard messages to communicate and share ideas with each other.  Also fee free to contact me directly if you feel your questions or comments are not appropriate for Blackboard.  You will be responsible for checking Blackboard routinely for announcements, clarification of assignments and general discussion.


 

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

 

          Three of the “Objectives of the MLIS degree program” are especially relevant to this course.  They are:

          1.  “Articulating and applying a philosophy of service that incorporates an  awareness of the legacy of libraries and information centers within our cultures” ,

          3.  “Identifying and analyzing information needs and opportunities of individuals and organizations, both within the traditional information service areas as well as the broader information sector” and

          5.  “Designing, implementing and evaluating systems, technologies, services and products that connect users with information”.

 

In order to accomplish these objectives, this course will provide students with the ability to:

 

(1)   Provide both an historical and current perspective of the organization of knowledge;

 

(2)   Provide an overview of the principles, methods and systems for describing materials (e.g., AACR2R, Dublin Core, FRBR, etc.) so that today’s users can find the materials they are looking for regardless of format; 

 

(3)   Provide an overview of organizational concepts that affect how information can be retrieved/accessed in order to meet user needs in diverse environments (authority work, classification schemes);

 

(4)   Provide an overview of various encoding standards and practices (e.g., MARC21, SGML and its offshoots (e.g.,  Dublin Core, HTML, XML) and how they are used in today’s online environments through online library systems and the Web;

 

(5)   Describe the above objectives within a library setting in order to understand how they are relevant to real-life library operations and administration;

 

(6)   Encourage analytical thinking about the overlapping organization of knowledge within and outside a library context by synthesizing, generalizing, and extrapolating concepts facing today’s library professionals.

 

ASSIGNMENTS AND COURSE REQUIREMENTS

 

            There are two types of assignments:  one that is turned in for feedback (ungraded); the other that is turned in for grading.  Each will be identified accordingly in the syllabus.

 

          All turned in assignments (graded and ungraded) must contain a cover sheet with the name and number of the course, the name and number of the assignment, the date and, of course, the individual’s name doing the assignment.  An example will be posted on Blackboard.  All assignments must be double-spaced, with a 12 pitch font.  Exceptions will be made for AACR2R examples and work forms specially designed for specific assignments. Please include page numbers.   Further instructions will be given in class.

 

          To help in GSLIS program assessment, all students are required to submit a final assignment that will be anonymously evaluated by the GSLIS Assessment Committee.  This evaluation process will be separate from the grading of your assignment by your professor and will have no influence on your grade for the course.  Additional information about the common assessment evaluation can be found under “Assessment”.

         

          Any essays (be it for assignments or for exams) will be evaluated on the following criteria as is appropriate: 

 

          Persuasive presentation of position (where appropriate)

                   Supporting reasons are sufficient and appropriate

                   Position is effectively supported

                   Evidence of reading and reflection

          Clarity of exposition

                   Logical train of thought

                   Adequate connections between ideas, examples, etc.

          Quality of writing

                   Proper grammar, spelling and sentence structure

          Bibliography, as needed

 

 

           

IMPORTANT COURSE INFORMATION:

                    

Course approach:

Teaching strategies may include assigned readings, lectures, demonstrations, class participation, in-class assignments, and discussions of the applications of the cataloging and classification tools discussed in class.  Theoretical concepts, practical applications and technical definitions will typically be presented through class lecture and assigned readings.  Students will then demonstrate their understanding by applying the concepts to simulated situations and by presenting these projects orally in class and in writing. 

 

Participating in class discussion will be one of the factors in the final grade.  It is therefore expected that students will not only read the assignments but think about them and thoughtfully evaluate them.  Questions will be posed to you during the class that will provoke thought, analysis and evaluation.


 

ASSESSMENT:

 

            There will be three exams during the semester:  a mid-term, a test of your cataloging and classification knowledge, and a final exam.   All three tests will be take-home.  There will be two other assignments that will be graded in addition to ungraded assignments.  The following describes the composition of your final grade.

 

                   Class participation (includes Blackboard)                5%

                   Midterm exam                                                          25%

                   Ungraded assignments

                             MARC Format                                        10%

                             AACR2 descriptive cataloging

                             AACR2 choice/form of entry

                             Sears Subject Headings

                             Dewey Decimal Classification

                                and Cutter numbers        

                   Graded assignments (averaged)                         10%

                             Library visit    

Web assessment                        

                   “One More Monograph”                                     25%            

                   Final exam/Common Assessment                       25 %

 

LIS 703 Uniform Assignment Explanation

The current GSLIS Assessment Plan calls for a uniform assignment in each required course (LIS 701, LIS 703, LIS 704, and LIS 770) which will be used to assess progress toward the GSLIS program’s Learning Outcomes.  The uniform assignment also carries a uniform weight toward the student’s grade in that course.  This assignment serves as the common assignment for LIS 703, and will count for 15% of the student’s grade in that course.

All students enrolled in all sections of  LIS 703, Organization of Knowledge, should be aware that an anonymous copy of their final paper will be evaluated by a committee of GSLIS faculty to help determine how effectively students demonstrate competencies articulated in Outcome 1 of the of the GSLIS Assessment Plan.

Outcome 1: Students will demonstrate an understanding of the philosophies, practices, and theories of library and information science that incorporates an awareness of the legacies, values, and ethical responsibilities of libraries and the information professions.

 

Students will submit two (2) copies of this assignment on the due date, one of which will not include the student’s name.  All formatting should be the same as in the original paper.

 

A statistically valid number of anonymous papers will be selected using a random numbers table. The papers will be reviewed by a committee of faculty who teach LIS 703.  Results of the assessment process will be included in the ongoing GSLIS program review and planning process.  This process will have no impact whatsoever on the student’s grade for the course.

 

Grades and Grade Point Equivalents:

 

The following grades and their grade point equivalents for the Dominican University Graduate Schools are:

 

Alpha grade

Numerical equivalent

Point span

A

4.0

100-95

A-

3.67

94-90

B+

3.33

89-85

B

3.0

84-80

B-

2.67

79-75

C+

2.33

74-70

C

2.0

69-65

C-

1.67

64 and below

F

0.0

Below 59

 


 

Interpretations of Grades

The faculty of the Graduate School of Library and Information Science use the following guidelines in their grading:

 

Numeric

Grade  Equivalent      Definition

 

            A             4.0                 Outstanding achievement.  Student performance

                                                demonstrates full command of the course materials

                                                and evinces a high level of originality and/or creativity

                               that far surpasses course expectations; nearly flawless                       work.

 

            A-           3.67                Excellent achievement.  Student performance                                demonstrates

                                                thorough knowledge of the course materials and exceeds

                                                course expectations by completing all requirements in a

                                                superior manner.

 

            B+           3.33               Good solid work.  Student performance demonstrates                       strong

                                                comprehension of the course materials and exceeds

                                                course expectations on all tasks as defined in the course                       syllabus.

 

            B             3.0                 Satisfactory acceptable work.  Student performance                      meets designated course expectations, demonstrates                          understanding of the course materials and performs at                            an acceptable level.

 

            B-            2.67               Marginal work.  Student performance demonstrates                         incomplete, substandard understanding of course                                materials, or absence of required work; indicates danger                     of falling below acceptable grading standard.

 

            C+           2.33               Unsatisfactory work.  Student performance                                   demonstrates unsatisfactory understanding of course                          materials and inability to meet course requirements. 

 

            C             2.0                 Unacceptable work.  Student performance                                     demonstrates

          incomplete and inadequate understanding of course                   materials.

 

            C-           1.67                Poor work. 

 

            F             0.0                 Failing grade. 

 

Policies regarding completion of assignments:

 

            It is the student’s responsibility to complete assignments and turn them in on time.  Late assignments are strongly discouraged and the grade will lowered one full grade for each session an assignment is late.  If the student has a crisis, s/he must bring this to my attention immediately if s/he expects any adjustment to the assignment schedule.  I will then decide on a case-by-case basis if late penalties will be reduced or waived.  Additionally, there are no “do-overs” in this class.

 

Class room policies regarding attendance and late arrival:

 

          Students are expected to arrive to class on time and stay for the entire session.  You are graduate students and adults and are responsible for your actions.  Consequently, attendance will rarely be taken as a method of checking up on you.  However, if you are frequently late or miss classes, this will be held against you in the final grade.

 

          Students who must miss a class due to religious observance, illness or other emergency are asked to notify me by e-mail or phone before class time.  Students are responsible for obtaining class materials distributed during their absence, for ensuring their familiarity with the material covered in class, and for completing any assignments on schedule.

 

          You are expected to turn off all cell phones and pagers during class so that full attention can be given to the work at hand.

 

Statements about consequences for failure to meet the requirements of the course or classroom policies:

 

          Students are expected to attend class, read the assigned texts, participate in class discussions, complete in-class and homework assignments in the time frames stated, and to be present on exam days to turn in their exams.  If problems arise in meeting these expectations, I am willing to work with you to resolve them but it is your responsibility to tell me if you are running into difficulties.  If problems continue on an ongoing basis and it becomes apparent to me that you are unable to meet the criteria for completing this course, the dean or acting dean will be notified and you will receive and “I”, “WX”, “WF” or “NC” for the course as is appropriate.

 

Taping or videoing the class

 

There will be no taping or videoing of the class unless the reason is to conform to ADA requirements.

 

Academic Honesty and Integrity: 

 

          “All students of the GSLIS are expected to observe high standards of academic honesty and integrity.  Any student whose conduct violates such standards may be subject to disciplinary action as determined by due process” (GSLIS Bulletin, p. 23).  Please see the Dominican University Student Handbook for the full statement on academic integrity.

 

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY

            URLs have been checked for currency and will be verified prior to any assignment.  Readings in electronic form are interfiled.

 

About Dublin Core Metadata Initiative DCMI.  (http://dublincore.org)

 

Art & Architecture Thesaurus (http://www.getty.edu/research/tools/vocabulary/aat)

 

American Library Association.  Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, Second edition, 2003 revision.  Chicago: ALA, 2003, plus updates.  Also available in Cataloger’s Desktop.

 

A Beginner’s Guide to HTML.  (http://www.ncsa.uiuc.edu/General Internet/WWW/HTMLPrimer.html)

 

Borges, Jorge Luis.  “The Library of Babel.”   (http://jubal.westnet.com/hyperdiscordia/library_of_babel.html)   

 

Bowen, Jennifer.  “FRBR: Coming Soon to Your Library?”  Library Resources & Technical Services, v. 49, no. 3 (July 2005), pp. 175-188. 

 

Caplan, Priscilla.  Metadata Fundamentals for All Librarians.  Chicago: ALA, 2003.

 

Cutter-Sanborn Three Figure Table (http://librarian.or.kr/reference/mark/cutter1.htm)

 

Dewey Decimal Classification, 4 volume set, 22nd ed.  (http://www.oclc.org/dewey/)

 

Dixon, Larry E.  Z39.50 and Its Use in Library Systems (Part one), ALCTS Newsletter 5, no. 6 (1994) and Part two, ALCTS Newsletter 6, no. 1 (1995).

 

Encoded Archival Description (EAD) DTD.  (http://lceb.loc.gov.ead/)

 

Evans, G. Edward, Sheila S. Intner, and Jean Weihs.  Introduction to Technical Services.  7th ed., Greenwood Village, Colo.: Libraries Unlimited 2002.

 

Hagler, Ronald.  The Bibliographic Record and Information Technology.  3rd ed. Chicago: ALA, 1997.

 

Intner, Sheila S. and Jean Weihs.  Standard Cataloging for School and Public Libraries.  3rd ed. Englewood, Colo.: Libraries Unlimited, 2001.

 

Lancaster, F.W. Indexing and Abstracting in Theory and Practice.  Champaign, Ill.: University of Illinois, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, 1991.

 

Library of Congress Classification, latest ed. (http://classweb.loc.gov/)

 

Library of Congress Subject Headings, latest edition. 

            (http://authorities.loc.gov)

          (http://classweb.loc.gov.Auto/)

          (OCLC CONNEXCION/PRISM Authority File)

 

Library of Congress Home Page. (http://www.loc.gov)

 

Mann, Thomas.  Library Research Models: A Guide to Classification, Cataloging, and Computers.  New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.

 

Maxwell, Robert L.  Maxwell’s Handbook for AACR2: Explaining and Illustrating the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules through the 2003 Update.  Chicago: ALA, 2004.

 

Medical Subject Headings.  MeSH Introduction.  Bethesda, Md.: National Library of Medicine

          Medical Subject Headings (http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/meshhome.html)

          Fact Sheet: Medical Subject Headings (MESH) (http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/mesh.html)

          Fact Sheet: UMLS Metathesaurus (http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/ulsmeta.html)

 

Miska, Francis L.  The DDC, the Universe of Knowledge, and the Post-Modern Library.  Albany, N.Y.: Forest Pr., 1998.

 

OCLC Connexion. (http://www.oclc.org/connexion/)

 

Overview SGML. (http://jefferson.village.virginia.edu/iath/treport/sgml.html)

 

Riva, Pat.  “Mapping MARC21 Linking Entry Fields to FRBR and Tillett’s Taxonomy of Bibliographic Relationships.” Library Resources & Technical Services. v. 48, no. 2 (April 2004), pp. 130-143. Chicago: ALA. 

 

Rowley, Jennifer E. and John Farrow.  Organizing Knowledge: An Introduction to Managing Access to Information.  3rd ed. Aldershot, England; Brookfield, Vermont: Ashgate, c2000.

 

Sears List of Subject Headings, 18th ed.  Joseph Miller, ed.  New York: H.W. Wilson, 2004.

 

Smiraglia, Richard P. The Nature of “A Work”: Implications for the Organization of Knowledge.  Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Pr., 2001.

 

Taylor, Arlene G.  The Organization of Information.  2nd ed.  Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited, 2004.

 

Taylor, Arlene G.  Introduction to Cataloging and Classification.  10th ed.  Englewood, Colo.: Libraries Unlimited, 2006.  ISBN 1591582350 (pbk.)  $50.00

 

Tennant, Roy.  “Digital Libraries:  Metadata Leadership”.  Library Journal, August 2004.

 

Text Encoding Initiative.  (http://www.tei-c.org/)

 

Tillett, Barbara.  What is FRBR?  Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress, 2004.  (http://www.loc.gov/cds/FRBR.html)

 

Understanding MARC Bibliographic Machine-Readable Cataloging.  Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress, 2003.  (http://lcweb.loc.gov/marc/umb/)

 

Vellucci, Sherry L. Herding Cats: Options for Organizing Electronic Resources.  Internet Reference Services Quarterly 1, no. 4 (1996): 9-30.

 

Weibel, Stuart.  The Dublin Core:  A Simple Content Description Model for Electronic Resources.  Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science 24, no. 1 (Oct.-Nov. 1997): 9-11.

 

What is GILS? (http://www.gils.net/intro.html)

 

Winke, R. Conrad.  “The Contracting World of Cutter’s Expansive Classification.”  Library Resources & Technical Services, vol. 48, no. 2 (April 2004) pp. 122-129.

 

 

 

 


COURSE CALENDAR

GSLIS 703-03, ORGANIZATION OF KNOWLEDGE

SPRING 2008

January 10-May 1, 2008

 

          The topics identified are not necessarily inclusive.  Readings should be completed on the date they are assigned.  In other words, if readings are listed for January 17, you are expected to have read the material for that day before coming to class.

 

DATE

 

TOPIC

ASSIGNED READING

ASSIGNMENT

JAN. 10

-- Introduction to the class

 

--  Libraries – Where they came from

 

-- How is knowledge organized in libraries?

 

 

Assignment 1, graded: due Jan. 17.   

   Visit a library of your choice.  Observe the ways in which materials in the library are organized and how the lay-out of the library helps or hinders.

    Write up your observations in a 4-5 page paper and come prepared to discuss your observations.  (See separate assignment sheet for more details.)

    

JAN. 17

Discussion of Library visits

 

-- Borges and Goldberger articles

 

--Knowledge vs. Information

 

-- How is knowledge organized:

-- Retrieval tools

-- Libraries and their catalogs

   -- Card catalogs and shared cataloging

   -- The creation of library databases

  -- OPACs

   -- ILSs

Borges, “The Library of Babel” (online citation)

Goldberger, “The Skyline: High-Tech Bibliophilia

 

 

 

Taylor/Org, Chapters 1, 3

 

Library visit paper due.


 

DATE

 

TOPIC

ASSIGNED READING

ASSIGNMENT

JAN. 24

Introduction to MARC

 

Taylor/Org, Chapter 2

 

Understanding MARC Bibliographic (see URL in the required reading list)

Assignment 2, due Jan. 31 (ungraded):  Searching Dominican’s online catalog, the CARLI Union List, and OCLC’s WorldCat.  Interpreting the MARC Format.  (See separate assignment sheet for more details.) 

JAN. 31

Discussion of the MARC Format Bibliographic

 

Taylor/Cat, Chapter 3

 

Taylor/Org, Chapter 4, pp. 69-78, Chapter 5

 

 

 

MARC Format Assignment due.

FEB. 7