DOMINICAN UNIVERSITY

GRADUATE SCHOOL OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE

 

LIS 733-01 Serials Management

Spring 2008, Jan. 16-Apr. 30

Wednesday, 6:00-9:00 pm

Marjorie E. Bloss, Instructor

Crown 342  

E-mail:  mbloss@dom.edu

Office hours:  By appointment

1-708-524-6468

 

COURSE DESCRIPTION:

          Bulletin Description of the Course:  An overview of serial publications, their genesis, forms, handling procedures and use.  A study of manual and mechanized procedures, content, selection and bibliographic control; library policy and administration of the serials function; and national and international cooperative serial programs.

 

TEXT BOOKS AND REQUIRED READING:  The textbook is available for purchase from the bookstore although you are welcome to purchase it elsewhere (e.g., Amazon). Other required readings and their URLs are listed below.

 

TEXTBOOK

Black, Steve.  Serials in libraries: issues and practices.  Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited, 2006.  ISBN 1-59158-258-X (pbk.)

 

REQUIRED DATABASES AND TOOLS NEEDED FOR THE COURSE. 

Anglo-American Cataloging Rules, 2nd revised edition, 2002 with minimally, the 2003 update.  Chicago : American Library Association, 2003.  Copies of AACR2 are available for use at Dominican University and also for purchase from the Bookstore if you should wish to do so. 

 

Catalogers Desktop.  Available on the computers at the Rebecca Crown GSLIS Computer Lab only.  At this writing, this cannot be accessed via the Web.

 

Crown Library Website (for accessing electronic journals).

 

Joint Steering Committee for the Revision of AACR2.  http://www.collectionscanada.ca/jsc/index.html

 

Library of Congress.  MARC21 format.  Washington, D.C. : Cataloging Distribution Service.  Available online at:

          http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/ecbdhome.html

Also available at http://connexion.oclc.org

(See separate document for authorization numbers and passwords.)

 

OCLC Connexion.  Available online at:

          http://connexion.oclc.org

Authorizations and passwords will be distributed separately.

Tillett, Barbara.  What is FRBR?  Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress, 2004.  (http://www.loc.gov/cds/FRBR.html)

 

Understanding MARC Bibliographic Machine-Readable Cataloging.  Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress, 2003.  (http://lcweb.loc.gov/marc/umb/)

 

OCLC ACCESS:

            http://www.oclc.org/home/

 

The Searching WorldCat Reference Card is available in HTML format at:

          http://www.oclc.rg/support/documentation/worldcat/searching/refcard/

It is also available in PDF format at:

          http://www.oclc.org/support/documentation/worldcat/searching/refcard/searchworldcatquickref.pdf

 

The Instructor assumes the right to modify the assigned readings during the semester as is appropriate.

 

BLACKBOARD ACCOUNTS:

          An online Blackboard (http://Blackboard.dom.edu) has been set up to facilitate the sharing of information, either administrative or questions about the class content.  This is a private Blackboard accessible only to students currently enrolled in the course.  I will provide instruction on setting up your Blackboard account during the first class session.  I will also set up Discussion Groups so we can share questions and ideas by e-mail.  Please feel free to post Blackboard messages to communicate and share ideas with each other.  Also fee free to contact me directly if you feel your questions or comments are not appropriate for Blackboard.  You will be responsible for checking Blackboard routinely for announcements, clarification of assignments and general discussion.

 

 

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

          Three of the “Objectives of the MLIS degree program” are especially relevant to this course.  They are:

          1.  “Articulating and applying a philosophy of service that incorporates an awareness of the legacy of libraries and information centers within our cultures” ,

          3.  “Identifying and analyzing information needs and opportunities of individuals and organizations, both within the traditional information service areas as well as the broader information sector” and

          5.  “Designing, implementing and evaluating systems, technologies, services and products that connect users with information”.

 

In order to accomplish these objectives, this course will provide students with the ability to:

 

1.      Provide both an historical and current perspective of serial resources and other continuing resources regardless of physical format;

 

2.      Provide an overview of organizational concepts that affect how serials and other continuing resources can be retrieved/accessed in order to meet user needs in diverse environments;

 

3.      Provide an overview of both traditional serial publishing and issuing serial resources digitally to include acquisition issues such as using vendors and aggregators, licensing, archiving, and copyright issues;

 

4.      Provide an overview of the principles, methods and systems for describing materials (e.g., AACR2R, Dublin Core, FRBR, etc.) so that today’s users can find the materials they are looking for regardless of format; 

 

5.      Provide an understanding of national and international cooperative ventures with regard to record creation and maintenance, the creation and maintenance of standards that apply to serials and continuing resources;

 

6.      Provide and understanding for the methods in which serials and continuing resources affect various departments in the library.    

 

 

IMPORTANT COURSE INFORMATION:

                    

Course approach:

Teaching strategies may include assigned readings, lectures, demonstrations, class participation, in-class assignments, papers and presentations.  Theoretical concepts, practical applications and technical definitions will typically be presented through class lecture and assigned readings.  Students will then demonstrate their understanding through class and Blackboard discussions and by presenting their findings from papers orally in class and in writing. 

 

Participating in class discussion will be one of the factors in the final grade.  It is therefore expected that students will not only read the assignments but think about them and thoughtfully evaluate them.  Questions will be posed to you during the class that will provoke thought, analysis and evaluation.

 

ASSESSMENT:

 

Short paper                                                              20% of your grade

Midterm Examination                                                  30% of your grade

Long paper                                                               20% of your grade

Final Examination                                                       20% of your grade

Other assignments, class attendance,

     and participation                                                   10% of your grade

                  


Grades and Grade Point Equivalents:

 

          The following grades and their grade point equivalents for the Dominican University Graduate Schools are:

 

Alpha grade

Numerical equivalent

Point span

A

4.0

100-95

A-

3.67

94-90

B+

3.33

89-85

B

3.0

84-80

B-

2.67

79-75

C+

2.33

74-70

C

2.0

69-65

C-

1.67

64 and below

F

0.0

Below 59

 


 

Interpretations of Grades

          The faculty of the Graduate School of Library and Information Science use the following guidelines in their grading:

 

Numeric

Grade  Equivalent      Definition

 

            A             4.0                 Outstanding achievement.  Student performance

                                                demonstrates full command of the course materials

                                                and evinces a high level of originality and/or creativity

                               that far surpasses course expectations; nearly flawless                       work.

 

            A-           3.67                Excellent achievement.  Student performance                                demonstrates

                                                thorough knowledge of the course materials and exceeds

                                                course expectations by completing all requirements in a

                                                superior manner.

 

            B+           3.33               Good solid work.  Student performance demonstrates                       strong

                                                comprehension of the course materials and exceeds

                                                course expectations on all tasks as defined in the course                       syllabus.

 

            B             3.0                 Satisfactory acceptable work.  Student performance                      meets designated course expectations, demonstrates                          understanding of the course materials and performs at                            an acceptable level.

 

            B-            2.67               Marginal work.  Student performance demonstrates                          incomplete, substandard understanding of course                                materials, or absence of required work; indicates danger                     of falling below acceptable grading standard.

 

            C+           2.33               Unsatisfactory work.  Student performance                                   demonstrates unsatisfactory understanding of course                          materials and inability to meet course requirements. 

 

            C             2.0                 Unacceptable work.  Student performance                                     demonstrates

          incomplete and inadequate understanding of course                   materials.

 

            C-           1.67                Poor work. 

 

            F             0.0                 Failing grade. 

 

Policies regarding completion of assignments:

            It is the student’s responsibility to complete assignments and turn them in on time.  Late assignments are strongly discouraged and the grade will lowered one full grade for each session an assignment is late.  If the student has a crisis, s/he must bring this to my attention immediately if s/he expects any adjustment to the assignment schedule.  I will then decide on a case-by-case basis if late penalties will be reduced or waived.

          There are no “do-overs” in this class.

 

Class room policies regarding attendance and late arrival:

          Students are expected to arrive to class on time and stay for the entire session.  You are graduate students and adults and are responsible for your actions.  While I will not take attendance, I do notice whether or not you are late for class or skip sessions altogether.  Frequent tardiness or missing classes without good cause will be held against you.

 

          Students who must miss a class due to religious observance, illness or other emergency should notify me by e-mail or phone before class time.  Students are responsible for obtaining class materials distributed during their absence, for ensuring their familiarity with the material covered in class, and for completing any assignments on schedule.

 

          You are expected to turn off all cell phones and pagers during class so that full attention can be given to the work at hand.

 

Statements about consequences for failure to meet the requirements of the course or classroom policies:

          Students are expected to attend class, read the assigned texts, participate in class discussions, complete in-class and homework assignments in the time frames stated and to be present on exam days to turn in their exams.  If problems arise in meeting these expectations, I am willing to work with you but it is your responsibility to tell me if you are running into difficulties.  If problems continue on an ongoing basis and it becomes apparent to me that you are unable to meet the criteria for completing this course, the dean or acting dean will be notified and you will receive and “I”, “WX”, “WF” or “NC” for the course as is appropriate.

 

Taping or videoing the class

          There will be no taping or videoing of the class unless the reason is to conform with ADA requirements.  If you do need special allowances because of an ADA situation, please let me know immediately so I can accommodate you.

 

Academic Honesty and Integrity: 

          “All students of the GSLIS are expected to observe high standards of academic honesty and integrity.  Any student whose conduct violates such standards may be subject to disciplinary action as determined by due process” (GSLIS Bulletin, p. 23).  Please see the Dominican University Student Handbook for the full statement on academic integrity.

 

 


DOMINICAN UNIVERSITY

GSLIS 733-01, SERIALS

SPRING 2008

January 16-April 30, 2007

Wednesday, 6:00-9:00 p.m.

 

Marjorie E. Bloss, Lecturer

 

COURSE SCHEDULE AND ASSIGNMENTS

 

          Assignments and readings are due on the date listed in the syllabus.  For example, you will have been expected to have read the assignments that appear in the January 23rd  box for class on January 23rd.

 

 

JAN. 16

Lecture

·         Introductions

·         Introduction to the course

·         What are continuing resources, integrating resources, serials?

·         Change and serials management

In-class work

 

Assignment

 

Readings

 

 

 

 

JAN. 23

Lecture

·         Where serials came from, where are they going?

·         Newspapers

·         Publish or perish and its effect on scholarly publishing

 

In-class work

Small group discussion of the serials environment based on readings

Assignment

  • Begin to work on the short paper due February 20th

Readings

  • Black, ch. 1 “The Serials Environment”
  • Goldberg, Tyler and Neal Nixon.  “Serials control: past, present and future imperfect”.  Serials Review, 31:3, Sept. 2005, p. 206-209
  • Highby, Wendy.  “Linking changes thinking: the acceleration of E-journal control issues for technical services staff”.  Colorado Libraries 31:3, Fall 2005 pp. 40-42
  • White, Joycelyn.  “Effecting Change in Periodicals Service: Management Models and a Process.”  Serials Review, 32:1, March 2006, pp. 22-25/

 


 

JAN. 30

Lecture

·         General workflow in a serials department

·         Serials Control and Integrated Library Systems

In-class work

Organizing serials departments

Assignment

Work on short paper and abstract for major paper

Readings

  • Black, ch. 4, “”Serials Workflow in Libraries”
  • Black, ch. 7, “Issues in Scholarly Journal Publishing”
  • Van Orsdel, Lee C and Kathleen Born.  “Choosing sides”.  Library Journal, 130:7, April 15, 2005
  • Crawford, Walt.  “Journals Revisited: A survivable future”.  American Libraries 35:5, May 2004, p. 56.
  • McMillan, Gail.  “Librarians as publishers: is the digital library an electronic publisher?”  College and Research Libraries News.  61:10, Nov. 2000, pp. 928-931

 

 

FEB. 6

Lecture

Understanding and Using Serial Bibliographic and Holdings Records: the MARC Formats

In-class work

In class:  Look up serial titles in OCLC and trace their history:

     Organic gardening

     Drama review

     American Association for the Education of the Severely/Profoundly Handicapped

 

Assignment

Work on short paper and abstract for major paper

Readings

  • Black, ch. 5, ”Bibliographic Control of Serials”
  • Library of Congress.  Understanding MARC Bibliographic.  Washington, D.C.: Cataloging Distribution Service.  Available online at: www.loc.gov/marc/umb/

 

 

FEB. 13

Lecture

Helping library patrons to adjust to Electronic Publications

In-class work

 

Assignment

Work on short paper and abstract for major paper

Readings

  • Black, ch. 9, “Teaching Patrons to Use Serials”
  • Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd rev. ed.,  Chapter 12
  • Hirons, Jean. “Reflections on seriality”.  Serials Librarian, 43:2, 2002, pp. 123-141
  • Hirons, Jean.  “Seriality: what have we accomplished?  What’s next?” Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 36:3/4, p. 121-140
  • Bucknall, Tim.  “The virtual consortium”.  Library Journal, Spring 2005.

 


 

FEB. 20

Lecture

 

In-class work

Discussion of Short papers: 10-15 minute summary per person

Assignment

Short paper due

Readings

 

 

 

FEB. 27

Lecture

·         Serial Records and Cooperative Ventures: AACR2, CONSER, Union Lists

·         The Future of Serials Cataloging: FRBR and RDA

In-class work

 

Assignment

Abstract of major paper due

Readings

  • Tillett, Barbara.  What is FRBR?  Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress, 2004.  (http://www.loc.gov/cds/FRBR.html)
  • Jones, Ed.  “The FRBR Model as Applied to Continuing Resources.  Library Resources & Technical Services.  49:4, Oct. 2005.  pp. 227-242. 
  • Tillett and Jones.  “Letters to the Editor”.  Library Resources & Technical Services.  50:3, July 2006.  pp.152-156.
  • Allgood, Julian Everett.  “Serials and Multiple Versions, or the Inexorable Trend toward Work-Level Displays.”  Library Resources & Technical Services.  51:3, pp. 160-178.   

 

 

 

MAR. 5

Lecture

SPRING BREAK – NO CLASS

In-class work

 

Assignment

 

Readings

 

 

 

MAR. 12

Lecture

Serials Acquisitions:  The Librarian’s perspective:  Guest speaker

Collection development and assessment

In-class work

 

Assignment

Finalize major paper topic

Midterm distributed

Readings

  • Black, ch. 3, “Budgeting, Selection, and Deselection”
  • Van Orsdel, Lee and Born, Kathleen.  “Journals in the time of Google.”, Library Journal, 131:7, pp. 39-44.

 


MAR. 19

Lecture

Serials Acquisitions: The Vendor’s Perspective.  Guest speaker

In-class work

Mid-term exam due

Assignment

Work on major paper

Readings

  • Black, ch. 6, “Economics and the Market for Serials”
  • Rigazzi, John.  “The shifting sands of open access publishing”.  Serials Review, 30:4, p. 275

Van Orsdel, Lee and Born, Kathleen.  “Closing in on Open Access.”  Library Journal 129:7, pp. 43-48

 

MAR. 26

Lecture

Access vs. Ownership

In-class work

Cancellation projects

Assignment

Work on major paper

Readings

  • Black, ch. 2, “Remote Access Serials”
  • Black, ch. 8, “Use of Serials”
  • Oberg, Steve. “Which route do I take? A viewpoint on locally developed versus commercially available journal management solutions”.  Serials Review, 30:2, 2004, pp. 122-126
  • Walters, William H.  “Criteria for replacing print journals with online journal resources: the importance of sustainable access notes on operations”.  Library Resources & Technical Services, 48:4, Oct. 2004, pp. 300-304.

 

 

APR. 2

Lecture

Electronic serials management:  Guest speaker 

In-class work

 

Assignment

Work on major paper

Readings

  • Simpson, Pamela and Robert Seeds.  “Electronic journals in the online catalog: selection and bibliographic control”.  Library Resources & Technical Services, 42:2, April 1998, pp. 126-132.
  • Walters, William H.  “Criteria for replacing print journals with online journal resources: the importance of sustainable access notes on operations.”  Library Resources & Technical Services, 48:4, Oct. 2004, pp. 300-304
  • Watson, Paula D.  E-journal management: acquisition and control.  American Library Association, 2003.
  • Stemper, Jim and Susan Barribeau.  “Perpetual Access to Electronic Journals.” Library Resources & Technical Services, 50:2, April 2006. pp. 91-109

 


APR. 9

Lecture

Scholarly Publishing

Copyright and Intellectual Property

Future of Serials Management

In-class work

 

Assignment

Work on major paper

Readings

  •  “The SPARC Initiative: A survey of participants and features analysis on their journals”.  Journal of Academic Librarianship. 31:3, May 2005, pp. 236-246
  • Schaffner, Melanie B. and Judy Luther and October Ivins.  “Project MUSE’s new pricing model: a case study in collaboration”. Serials Review, 31:3, Sept. 2005, pp. 192-199.
  • Koehler, Amy E.C. “Some Thoughts on the Meaning of Open Access for the University Technical Services.”  Serials Review, 32:1, March 2006, pp. 17-21

 

APR. 16

Lecture

No formal class

In-class work

 

Assignment

Prepare for presentations.  Work on major paper

Readings

 

 

 

APR. 23

Lecture

 

In-class work

Major paper and presentations due. 

Assignment

Final exam distributed

Readings

 

 

 

APR. 30

Lecture

Pulling it all together:  Guest speaker

In-class work

FINAL EXAM due

Assignment

 

Readings

 

 

 


SPECIFIC ASSIGNMENTS

          The requirements for this class include a short paper, a major research paper, and two take-home exams.

 

Short paper

          Prepare a 4-6 page paper comparing and contrasting a serial publication that exists in both paper and electronic form.  The publication can be a single journal title, a group of titles, a publisher-based package, or an indexing/abstracting tool.  The paper should include all aspects of the publication including but not necessarily limited to format, access mechanisms, indexing, usability, price, and purchase options, etc.  The paper should include conclusions that state reasons why and when users would prefer one option over the other.

          You will be expected to present your findings to the class that include the presentation itself as well as a hand-out.  It is your choice as to what is the most effective hand-out:  a PowerPoint presentation, or a hand-out highlighting your work.  Please attach this to the paper you turn in.

 

          The short paper is due on Wednesday, February 20. 

 

          This assignment will comprise 20% of your grade.

 

Major paper

          This is a major research paper and can be on any topic related to serials management, serial publishing trends, or the place of serials in libraries.  The paper should be about 10-15 narrative pages, should contain appropriate footnotes, and a comprehensive bibliography.

 

          Topic selection:  Some ideas for topics for your paper include the following:

                   Publication patterns

                   Cataloging integrated resources

                   Function Requirements for Bibliographic Records (as it relates to serials)

                   Open Access

                   Serials work flow management

                   Subscription agents

                   Union lists of serials

                   Journal cancellation projects

                   Licensing electronic journals

                   Journal use study methods

                   Skills required for successful serials librarianship

                   Using earliest, latest, or successive entry for serial title changes

                   Serials and integrated library systems

         

The paper is due in two components:

          Wednesday, February 27 – Paper topic and abstract due to the instructor.  I will comment on your proposed topic and return those comments to you the following week.   You will not be graded on this but it is a required assignment.  The abstract should be one or two paragraphs in length and should state your goals and expectations for the paper.  You should also include a brief bibliography (5-7 items) showing that you have begun research.

 

          Wednesday, April 23 – Paper and PowerPoint used for presentation due to instructor.  You will be graded on content, presentation, and PowerPoint.  Your papers will demonstrate evidence of your ability to comprehend an issue dealing with serials, to assimilate information obtained from various sources, and to write a graduate-level research paper.

 

          In addition to the written paper, you will be expected to make a 15-20 minute PowerPoint presentation on your research in class.  

                  

                   The paper, presentation, and PowerPoint will comprise 30% of your grade.

 

Midterm Examination

          A take-home midterm exam will be given out on Wednesday, March 12 and will be due the following Wednesday (March 19).  This exam will cover material presented during the first half of the semester.  It will primarily consist of short answer essay questions.  It is an open book test.

 

                   This exam will comprise 20% of your grade.

 

Final Exam

          A final exam will be distributed on Wednesday, April 23rd and will be due the following Wednesday (April 30).

 

                   This exam will comprise 20% of your grade.

 

COURSE REQUIREMENTS

          Any essay (be it for assignments or for exams) will be evaluated on the following criteria: 

          Persuasive presentation of position (where appropriate)

                   Supporting reasons are sufficient and appropriate

                   Position is effectively supported

                   Evidence of reading and reflection

          Clarity of exposition

                   Logical train of thought

                   Adequate connections between ideas, examples, etc.

          Quality of writing

                   Proper grammar, spelling and sentence structure

          Bibliography, as needed

 

GRADING COMPONENTS

Your final grade will be composed of the following components:

          Short paper                                                              20%

          Midterm exam                                                                   20%

          Long paper                                                              30%

          Final exam                                                               20%

          Other assignments, attendance, and participation             10%

 

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY

            URLs have been checked for currency and will be verified prior to any assignment.  Readings in electronic form are interfiled.

 

American Library Association.  Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, Second edition, 2003 revision.  Chicago: ALA, 2003, plus updates.  Also available in Cataloger’s Desktop.

 

Bowen, Jennifer.  “FRBR: Coming Soon to Your Library?”  Library Resources & Technical Services, v. 49, no. 3 (July 2005), pp. 175-188. 

 

Corbett, Lauren E. “Serials: Review of the Literature 2000-2003.” Library Resources &Technical Services, Jan. 2006, 50:1, pp. 16-30.

 

Evans, G. Edward, Sheila S. Intner, and Jean Weihs.  Introduction to Technical Services.  7th ed., Greenwood Village, Colo.: Libraries Unlimited 2002.

 

Guedon, Jean-Claude.  The “green” and “gold” roads to Open Access: the case for mixing and matching”.  Serials Review, 30:4, 2004.

 

Guedon, Jean-Claude.  In Oldenburg’s long shadow: librarian’s research scientists, publishers, and the control of scientific publishing.  In Creating the digital future: Proceedings of the 138th Annual Meeting of the Association of Research Libraries, 2001.  Washington, D.C., Association of Research Libraries.

 

Innovative Redesign and Reorganization of Library Technical Services : Paths for the Future and Case Studies, edited by Bradford Lee Eden.  Westport, Conn. : Libraries Unlimited, 2004. 

 

Jones, Ed.  “The FRBR Model as Applied to Continuing Resources.  Library Resources & Technical Services.  49:4, Oct. 2005.  pp. 227-242.

 

Library of Congress Home Page. (http://www.loc.gov)

 

Library Resources & Technical Services.  Chicago : American Library Association, Association for Library Collections and Technical Services.  ISSN 0024-2527.

 

Mann, Thomas.  Library Research Models: A Guide to Classification, Cataloging, and Computers.  New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.

 

Maxwell, Robert L.  Maxwell’s Handbook for AACR2: Explaining and Illustrating the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules through the 2003 Update.  Chicago: ALA, 2004.

 

Riva, Pat.  “Mapping MARC21 Linking Entry Fields to FRBR and Tillett’s Taxonomy of Bibliographic Relationships.” Library Resources & Technical Services. v. 48, no. 2 (April 2004), pp. 130-143. Chicago: ALA.

 

Serials Librarian.  New York:  Haworth Press.

 

Serials Review.  New York : Elsevier.  ISSN 0098-7913

 

Stueart, Robert D. and Barbara B. Moran.  Library Information Center Management.  7th edition.  Westport, Conn. : Libraries Unlimited, 2007.

 

Taylor, Arlene G.  The Organization of Information.  2nd ed.  Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited, 2004.

 

Taylor, Arlene G.  Introduction to Cataloging and Classification.  10th ed.  Englewood, Colo.: Libraries Unlimited, 2006.

 

Tuttle, Marcia.  Managing serials.  Greenwich, Conn. : JAI Press, 1996.

 

Understanding FRBR: What It Is and How It Will Affect Our Retrieval Tools, edited by Arlene G. Taylor.  Philadelphia: Greenwood, 2007.  ISBN 9781591585091.

 

Watson, Paula D.  E-journal Management : Acquisition and Control.  Chicago : American Library Association, 2003.

 

Willinsky, John.  The access principle:  the case for open access to research and scholarship.  Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 2006.

 

Yiotis, Kristin.  “The open access initiative: a new paradigm for scholarly communication”.  Information Technology and Libraries, 24:4, 2005.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

meb20071229